Which type of deterrence relates to the ability to recover from disruptions quickly?

The correct answer is focused on the concept of resilience, which is vital in maritime warfare and overall strategic military planning. Deterrence through resilience emphasizes the capability of a state or military force to absorb disruptions and continue functioning effectively. This is formulated on the understanding that an adversary is less likely to initiate aggression if they recognize that their actions will not only fail to achieve their goals but will also be countered by a robust recovery mechanism.

In the context of maritime operations, resilience encompasses the ability to maintain operational capabilities despite potential challenges, such as attacks, natural disasters, or logistical setbacks. By enhancing resilience, a navy or military force can deter potential aggressors who might calculate that an attack could easily incapacitate or disrupt operations.

Other types of deterrence, such as cost imposition or denial, focus on threatening to impose costs on an adversary or denying them their objectives through stronger defenses. Extended capability relates to the expansion of one's military reach or power projection, which does not specifically address recovery from disruptions. These different deterrence strategies are critical, but they serve different purposes compared to the immediate benefits provided by a resilient system designed to bounce back from adversity.